Archive for the 'ethnic studies' Category

Sociology Alumni Survey

Friday, October 12th, 2007

Busy days continue, but I did have a chance to answer a Sociology Survey I got via email. Thought it would be worth posting the questions/responses.
Sociology Alumni Survey – So what did you do with a sociology major? We know that our majors go on to do many different things with their lives. We’d love to hear from you about what you have done, and how your education in sociology might have affected you. The whole survey includes four open-ended questions (your answers can be as long or short as you want) and a couple of short information questions. We are interested in hearing from you to help us improve our program. Optionally, please give us your contact information if you want to get our newsletter a few times a year. You will NOT be getting a lot of junk mail from us, nor will we share your information with others.

Q: What have you done since you left college? (Occupations, family, service, politics etc.) Tell us whatever you want us to know.

A: Worked for the state of Hawaii, took evening classes at the University of Hawaii in Economics and Political Science as an unclassified graduate student. After that I returned to Madison for a Master’s degree in public policy from the La Follette Institute, and am currently working for the federal government and working on a law degree as an part-time, evening student.

Q: Has your education in sociology been relevant or useful in your life? How? (We are wondering about general citizenship or social awareness as well as occupations.)

A: One of the true realities both in academia and in the real world is that humans are by nature social beings, and thus the study of society is very relevant and useful in living as a human being. I think the sociology education at UW-Madison has help make me a more conscious person better able to appreciate better people from different backgrounds, perspectives, socio-economic status, cultural, religious and personal values. This broader perspective comes in handy when working with other people in the real life work environment. Office politics always come into play and it helps to understand co-worker’s backgrounds as possible markers or explanations for their behaviors. There is also much to be said about the study of sociology as a means of establishing a strong sense of identity and self worth, which I find is essential for confidence and general happiness in life.

Q: Are there any classes or professors or other experiences in our program that stand out in your mind as especially memorable or useful?

A: Professor Duneier’s introduction course to Sociology was very memorable. I actually took it late in my degree path, one of my last soc courses but ended up being very enjoyable and personally beneficial. I was especially interested in Mitch’s research in writing “Sidewalk” and how he invited one of the people he met during his research to visit Madison as a guest lecturer. He was a “subject” in the strictest sense, but the respectful but honest way that Mitch wrote about him and interacted with him reflected the very human-focused aspects of sociology.

The other memorable sociology course that I had the opportunity to take was professor Elder’s Global Village seminar which gave students currently living in the Merit House Global Village a chance to share and learn from each other’s cultural backgrounds and experiences.

Another memorable course that I took which I believe was cross-listed in Sociology and Afro-Am Studies was professor Michael Thornton’s course on cross cultural interactions between ethnic minority groups. The premise of the course was to move away from focusing on white-black interactions and to allow discussions on asian-black, brown-black and other interracial interactions that are as much of a reality as the white-black discussion. I found his no-nonsense approach towards discussing race relations in an open and active setting very beneficial to thinking outside of the box, which is what we as societies need to constantly be challenging themselves in order to improve race relations beyond the status quo.

Q: Do you have any suggestions for future students or for us that would improve our program for students?

A: Looking back on everything, I think more efforts at providing career and job placement to sociology majors would be helpful. Sociology gets a bad rap as an “easy” major with limited job prospects on graduation without plans to go to graduate school. There are opportunities out there, but I remember as a student I was at times a little uncertain what I would be doing after graduation with a sociology degree. While I can definitely say that the degree program overall prepared me for the next steps in my academic and professional development, most of my opportunities were obtained on my own with minimal official guidance from the sociology department. Instead, it came from the professors themselves that I reached out to for guidance and advice. Also triple majoring and getting a criminal justice certificate probably helped out as well.

Linkes 10/10/2007:
Book of sadness
Facebook stalking new college pasttime
Ann Telnaes: Cartoons
Greco Weightclasses light to middle to heavy
Whats in a score anyway?

Colonial mentality, USA Today and Continuing Discussion on Hate Crimes in Hawaii

Thursday, March 22nd, 2007

I came across this article today about the sentencing hearing for one of the six crimes that occurred in Hawaii in 2006 that were classified as hate crimes. This time it involved a good intentioned bystander coming to the rescue of what he thought was animal abuse. The dreaded H-word was thrown about while the local defendant, his nephew and his son beat up the victim. It reminded me to follow up on my earlier post on the assault and battery that occurred in a Waikele parking lot back home, that was characterized as “racially motivated” by USA today article, and a continued conversation with my wingnut, self-proclaimed “conservative” friend about race relations in Hawaii. After reading what I had sent to him, I realized that it might be worth posting the gist of our exchange below. A few observations I had on this case that I forwarded to my friend along with the article:

1) “Given the limited facts presented, doesn’t this sound similar to the parking lot incident? Why is this a hate crime and the parking lot incident is not?”
2) “I still don’t think this should be a hate crime either just because of the added use of racially charged words, this is an open and shut assault and battery case.”
3) “Doesn’t this inconsistency of applying the hate crime statute highlight my earlier point about the difficulties of applying hate crimes legislation based on words alone?”
4) “Isn’t 1 year kind of short sentence for a “hate crime” that we are seem to be going out of our way in punishing?”

I found his responses to the article typically short, oversimplified, but interesting nonetheless. First he declined to address the crux of my argument that hate crimes based on words alone are very problematic to characterize, and really classify, especially in a multi-ethnic setting such as Hawaii. Then he went on to comment that only minorities gang-jump victims, and are without honor or respect, and that this epidemic of hate crimes (6 out of 8,000 nationally for 2006) back home as an example of how Hawaii needs a dose of their own “Aloha Spirit” instead of imposing their brand of multiculturalism to the mainland.

His statements overall I wasn’t too surprised with, but I think illustrate the misconceptions and downright ignorance that Americans have with Hawaii in general, especially my immediate reactions which were captured in my responses to him:

“I think it is totally elitist to associate gang jumping as somehow characteristic of minority communities only. It’s not like minorities are the only ones that roam in packs, think about all the times we’ve seen all those fights down state street at bar time. Gang-jumping is really a standard tactic used by military and law enforcement to subdue an enemy/suspect. Don’t forget the history (and definition) of lynching in America.”

“I agree with you that respect and honor seems to be lacking in our present society, but I think I disagree with you on the root cause, which I think you’re implying that minorities lack respect and honor due to their culture or values. I think your point (and general admission of holding elitist points of view) actually raises another very good question: To what extent do you think that elitism or polarization of groups that individuals identify with is contributing to the lack of respect and honor in our society?”

“do the math. 6 hate crimes is a tiny share of the national hate crime statistic even with the state with a population of 1.5M. Lets just estimate, saying that there are 260M people in the US, and 8,000 hate crimes in 2006, that would mean that a state with 1.5M should have about 46 hate crimes. 6 is a lot less than 46.”

“I’ll agree with you about the aloha spirit if you mean being more open and respectful of people of different cultures, and resolving conflicts non-violently. But again, your statement still demonstrates a limited understanding of race relations in Hawaii. A few isolated assaults where racially charged words were exchanged does not indicate a culture’s failure at race relations – take the statutory application of the hate crime, for all of 2006, Hawaii has only 6 of the 8,000+ hate crimes reported/charged nationally. I think the rest of the U.S. could use more “aloha spirit” as a whole as opposed to Hawaii. These types of crimes are being committed all the time out here, and with more extreme racial overtones and more serious outcomes. What is getting all the attention is the fact that the races of the victims are reversed – in these two cases the victims Haole, and the aggressors are “minorities” by U.S. classifications of race – usually on the mainland its the other way around.”

In trying to end on a lighter side I also shared a link to a related cartoon in the Honolulu Weekly resident cartoonist and provided this sidebar:

“This raises an important nuance abut the term “Haole” by the way the USA today article used it, a cold reader might think that it is a derogatory word, like the N-word or something. In reality it is used in the newspaper all the time, in fact most people will use the word to describe themselves in ethnic terms. Language, meaning and culture in Hawaii is especially contextual – a big guy charging down the beach yelling “F-ing Haole” is obviously a different context than someone writing a newspaper article about the governor or Captain Cook, or Father Damien.”

Linkes for 3/22/2007
VA hospitals deteriorating
Medical research on herbal treatments
Why Conservatives Can’t Govern or just aren’t cut out for it
Be on the lookout for predators in School
One incident the kid gets shot in the head
Casey Serin in a nutshell