Mid-july, on the brink of a heatwave, and war is spreading in the middle east. Seems like the past week has been marked with rapid escalation of bombings, airstrikes, rocket attacks, and casulties. It all happened so quickly it was surprising to see the newsreporters talking about bustling cafes and tourists in the “venice of the middleast” which quickly turned into a war zone. The recent developments are disturbing, mostly by the callous tactics on both sides, the bombing of civilian infrastucture and residential areas by the IDF, which are superior in terms of firepower and technology - and the kidnapping of soldiers by Hezbollah, reminiscant of the kidnapping and beheadings of western hostages in iraq broadcasted on the internet.
However I think what is most disturbing is the pathetic situation the US has been left as far as being able to broker any kind of a peace deal, or even a temporary cease-fire. In the past the US at least had an arguement, although cynical one, in being at least a somwehat credible peace broker to the ongoing palestinian-isreali conflict. This credibility and potential is gone now that we’re busying playing crusader. Its relaly hard to argue that you are in an impartial, nuetral situation with 145,000 troops occupying a neighboring country that are getting shot at and blown up daily. It is even harder to argue integrity in a peace process when some of these very same troops are committing war crimes that would amount to rape, murder and good old fashioned pillaging.
I’m hoping that this new conflict will be resolved peacefullly, but the cynical side of me thinks that this time it might be fore keeps. surprisingly enough, I have heard of a segmant of people who are cheering this on for, ironically, religious reasons. Kill the infidels, sure why not.
On a lighter note, I’ve been stumbling on more international reggae music courtesy of youtube - I’m digging this reggae singer Pushim - browsing around on the web I found some more clips and another video posting for some song called Bulldog” - has a good beat and groove to it, although I can’t quite get used to the Japanese lyrics mixed with random English words.
Got into a conversation on the then hot topic of the recent missle tests by N Korea, ot into the US military stance in E & SE asia regarding a potential confrontation with N Korea over a pre-emptive strike by Japan, or and/or a conflict with China over Taiwan declaring independence. speaking in hypothetical scenarios of course, he seemed overconfident of the US military ability to fight a triple fronted war against multiple adversaires, and that maintaining a naval blockade of China would not have any negative effects on the US and global trade economy. Granted on paper on certain specific points I could not disagree with him, I was a little taken aback by how hawkish he was about exerting US military capabilities so far so soon.
of course, there was also the cultural relativity question, being from Hawaii and perhaps ignoring the colonial and plantation and contract labor elements of our shared history, I would hope that any intelligent individual would have benefittd from that kind of perspective when looking at the current state of world affairs. The economic and political forces that granted a lot of Hawaiians and plantation immigrants their American citizenship were driven by global conquest and capitalistic missions of self-interest. The massive profits of the few and powerful were made from the blood sweat and tears of the weak, the immigrant, the poor. You might think that knowing this history one would inevitably question the motives and what the actual benefit to society does this approach have both in the short and long run. applying the economic arguement beyond the strict bottom line and think of it in terms of human captial and moral captial.
Eventually I asked if he had ever considered serving in the military given his hawkish stance, of course he said no. The next question would’ve been if he had any relatives or close friends in the military that might be sent into harms way, but I thought better of it, figuring I proabably already knew the answer to that question as well. Of course the third question would’ve been whether he would be a draft resister if the US ever has to start the draft boards up again to make up for a shortage of troops, or whether he would go willingly with the affirmed confidence he has in the capabilities of our armed forces to keep him out of harms way and unscathed.
I hope I’m wrong in the split-second impression, but I thought it was a pretty convincing illustration of the neo-con mentality that is captivated the country today. Ideally those that are so quick to wage war should be forced to sacrifice just as much as the soldiers who have to fight it on the ground - if you ask me anyone that is so quick to even think about putting others in harms way based on a classroom theory is unfit to lead. I hope that this past administration hasn’t been inspiring the younger generation that this is a proactive way to interact with the rest of the world.