Just finished watching the 3rd and final presidential debates. I think it was a mix of the same ole same ole, but a little bit more quicker paced than the other two. A couple observations about dubya, first off he tends to stray away from the question on hand and bring in a lot of irrelevant points into the debate. For example, he spent a long time talking about small business ownership when he was supposed to be talking about affirmative action. Well, ok, maybe there is a some sort of connection, but not really in the context from which the question was framed. The other thing I noticed from the debate is that he just comes off as a snickering defensive wiseguy, he glances at the camera a lot with a look on his face that he can’t believe the crap that is coming out of his opponents mouth. Oh, and he likes to wink at the camera a lot. Paul Krugman of the NYtimes has been writing a lot about this over the years, namely the distortions or spin on issues and actual statistics.
A good observation that someone said once is that dubya seems more interested in winning the arguement (or the election) as opposed to working out possible solutions to the problems that are facing the country. It shouldn’t be a surprise to people, where his loyalties lie, but part of me wishes that he would just be more frank about it. I’ve gotten to the point where I can’t take anything that he says serious anymore - something that bugs me that I can’t even listen to the president of the US without having to translate what he might really be saying.
He should stop trying to pretend to be such an angel and just level with the American people on whose voices really matters in politics. We live in a republic in which true power is concentrated among those who have the financial, political, or human capital, while the rest are given symbolic electoral power that really amounts to squat. That is of course for those who actually chose to exercise their right to participation in the democratic process instead of being distracted by the illusion of market capitalist democracy, or dollar-voting.
It really is a postmodernist twist, to deceive people into thinking that they know where you stand in simplistic terms, but all the while hold your agenda and priorities closed off.
Secondly, there is an extreme level of defensiveness when he responds to any question, or issue presented in front of him. To me, this shows weakness, that at least part of him knows how shaky his arguements are. It could be in part due to the fact that he has gotten used to speaking in front of captive, hand picked audiences and pre-screened questions, but I think its insecurity. He must know by now how he comes across, and how divided the country is either with or against him. In the debate this comes across as somebody that is already set in their ways to the point that no matter what you say, or what evidence you present to support your point, in their eyes, you are wrong. End of story. The kind of person that isn’t worth talking to about anything important beyond the weather or some meaningless shit like that.
It honestly reminds me of talking to a whacked out, born again fundamentalist, nothing gets in their skulls, no matter what you try. This being a free country and all, we tolerate people to be that ignorant, but I think its a problem when people this stuck in their ways actually wield executive power. In simplistic terms, democracy ceases to exist under such a leader. Instead we’d have a pope, or a monarch.
Thirdly, dubya is all rhetoric, with no substance in his arguements. At times he even confuses himself in repeating sound bites, he’ll get distracted and say something totally off base from the question at hand. Listening him talk about how Kerry has voted to increase taxes 98 times over the last 19 years as a response to 3-5 different questions was painful. Almost as painful as him claiming that any plan Kerry proposed would cost a lot of money, and would mean more taxes. This and all the little cuts at people who question his policies as being unpatriotic, or emboldening the enemy, or all that crap. All of this is just a distraction from the issues at hand, issues that will affect the direction that the country is headed in.
People watching need to realize that whether or not you supported the Iraq invasion the fiscal realities have already come home to roost. It is going to be a huge financial liability in the years to come, and with the increasing cost of health care, an aging population, huge trade deficits budget deficits, and outsourcing, Bush is going to have to be like Reagan and raise taxes in his second term.
His mention of market solutions to solve a lot of the social and fiscal problems that we face was another area where I was confused. He doesn’t seem to get, or be willing to admit that importing drugs from canada in itself is a solution that is driven by the market. The sheer cost of presciption medicine is forcing consumers of a good to look for alternatives. He claims that he doesn’t think Government should get involved in health care? well what the hell is passing legislation that prevents state health departments from buying presciption medicine in bulk, or importing from canada? Government intervention?
Another was that privatizing social security would be an automatic solution. Honestly if the rate of return on Social Security is looking so crappy, what makes anyone think that privatization would go over well with investors? It also goes to the nature of consumer behavior, that we strive to satisfy our unfinite wants from a finite supply of resources. We all want to maximize our benefits of a system or market sooner rather than later. All of this made me want to bust out my Econ 101 book from under my makeshift table and chuck it at the TV.
Final point on the debates that stuck out: That dubya has been a divider, as opposed to the uniter that he has claimed all these years. I still have yet to hear any arguement, spin or no spin, to convince me how one of the qualities we look for in a leader is an ability to bring people from different sides of an issue together. At the end of the day, we are all Americans, we are all human beings, true leaders are able to channel this through any adversity or disagreement and help the collective body or state move forward. The country has been extremely divided and partisan since 2000 and it doesn’t seem to look like it’ll get any better under 4 more years of bush.
To be fair, I haven’t been all that impressed with Kerry either, although I think he has come a long way since the primaries. But one thing is for certain, there is a lesser of two evils.